RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs Radeon R7 M360

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M360 with RTX 4500 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

R7 M360
2015
4 GB DDR3
1.41

RTX 4500 Ada Generation outperforms R7 M360 by a whopping 4681% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking104224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.72
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameMesoAD103
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (11 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3847680
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed1100 MHz2070 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz2580 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data210 Watt
Texture fill rate27.00619.2
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPS39.63 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs24240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L1 Cache96 KB7.5 MB
L2 Cache128 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M360 1.41
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 67.41
+4681%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M360 590
Samples: 371
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 28265
+4691%
Samples: 146

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−4483%
550−600
+4483%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Fortnite 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−4400%
450−500
+4400%
Valorant 35−40
−4614%
1650−1700
+4614%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 44
−4673%
2100−2150
+4673%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Dota 2 18−20
−4622%
850−900
+4622%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Fortnite 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−4400%
450−500
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Valorant 35−40
−4614%
1650−1700
+4614%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Dota 2 18−20
−4622%
850−900
+4622%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−4400%
450−500
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Valorant 35−40
−4614%
1650−1700
+4614%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−4400%
450−500
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−4543%
650−700
+4543%
Valorant 6−7
−4567%
280−290
+4567%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−4543%
650−700
+4543%
Valorant 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

This is how R7 M360 and RTX 4500 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4500 Ada Generation is 4483% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 67.41
Recency 5 May 2015 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX 4500 Ada Generation has a 4681% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M360 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M360 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 4500 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 224 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 27 votes

Rate RTX 4500 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M360 or RTX 4500 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.