GeForce RTX 5060 vs Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) with GeForce RTX 5060, including specs and performance data.

R2 (Stoney Ridge)
2016
15 Watt
0.94

RTX 5060 outperforms R2 (Stoney Ridge) by a whopping 1951% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1132282
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.689.92
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeGB206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)May 2025
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1283840
Core clock speedno data2280 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz2497 MHz
Number of transistors3100 Million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rateno data299.6
Floating-point processing powerno data19.18 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−680%
35−40
+680%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Fortnite 1−2
−10300%
100−110
+10300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−680%
35−40
+680%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Valorant 30−35
−371%
140−150
+371%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−879%
230−240
+879%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Dota 2 14−16
−1900%
280−290
+1900%
Fortnite 1−2
−10300%
100−110
+10300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−680%
35−40
+680%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−833%
55−60
+833%
Valorant 30−35
−371%
140−150
+371%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Dota 2 14−16
−1900%
280−290
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−680%
35−40
+680%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−833%
55−60
+833%
Valorant 30−35
−371%
140−150
+371%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−10300%
100−110
+10300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−2760%
140−150
+2760%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1620%
170−180
+1620%
Valorant 0−1 180−190

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 21−24
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 30−35

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−125%
35−40
+125%
Valorant 5−6
−2160%
110−120
+2160%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 8−9
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 5060 is 10300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 is ahead in 34 tests (58%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (42%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.94 19.28
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 145 Watt

R2 (Stoney Ridge) has 866.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5060, on the other hand, has a 1951.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
GeForce RTX 5060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 40 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 528 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) or GeForce RTX 5060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.