RTX A4000 Mobile vs Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) with RTX A4000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX A4000 Mobile outperforms R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) by a whopping 5675% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1236 | 154 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 23.34 |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 (2014) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
GPU code name | Beema/Mullins | GA104 |
Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 29 April 2014 (11 years ago) | 12 April 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 5120 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1140 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 600 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Number of transistors | no data | 17,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 115 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 268.8 |
Floating-point processing power | no data | 17.2 TFLOPS |
ROPs | no data | 80 |
TMUs | no data | 160 |
Tensor Cores | no data | 160 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 40 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 384.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | no data | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
CUDA | - | 8.6 |
DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−8100%
|
80−85
+8100%
|
God of War | 5−6
−1580%
|
80−85
+1580%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−8100%
|
80−85
+8100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 110−120 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−2660%
|
130−140
+2660%
|
God of War | 5−6
−1580%
|
80−85
+1580%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1675%
|
140−150
+1675%
|
Valorant | 27−30
−661%
|
210−220
+661%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 18−20
−1363%
|
270−280
+1363%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−8100%
|
80−85
+8100%
|
Dota 2 | 12−14
−1075%
|
140−150
+1075%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 110−120 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−2660%
|
130−140
+2660%
|
God of War | 5−6
−1580%
|
80−85
+1580%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
−8300%
|
80−85
+8300%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1675%
|
140−150
+1675%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−2340%
|
120−130
+2340%
|
Valorant | 27−30
−661%
|
210−220
+661%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−8100%
|
80−85
+8100%
|
Dota 2 | 12−14
−1075%
|
140−150
+1075%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 110−120 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−2660%
|
130−140
+2660%
|
God of War | 5−6
−1580%
|
80−85
+1580%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1675%
|
140−150
+1675%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−2340%
|
120−130
+2340%
|
Valorant | 27−30
−661%
|
210−220
+661%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−4250%
|
85−90
+4250%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 2−3
−12300%
|
240−250
+12300%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−2817%
|
170−180
+2817%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 1−2
−9200%
|
90−95
+9200%
|
4K
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−400%
|
75−80
+400%
|
Valorant | 3−4
−7133%
|
210−220
+7133%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−2200%
|
45−50
+2200%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 2−3
−2150%
|
45−50
+2150%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
Fortnite | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
Fortnite | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Valorant | 240−250
+0%
|
240−250
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
God of War | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
God of War | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A4000 Mobile is 12300% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX A4000 Mobile is ahead in 32 tests (52%)
- there's a draw in 30 tests (48%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.61 | 35.23 |
Recency | 29 April 2014 | 12 April 2021 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 8 nm |
RTX A4000 Mobile has a 5675.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX A4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.