GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL with GeForce GTX 760, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
12.38

GTX 760 outperforms Pro WX Vega M GL by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking402400
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.51
Power efficiency13.055.02
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code namePolaris 22GK104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date24 April 2018 (6 years ago)25 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801152
Core clock speed931 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1033 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt170 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate80.8899.07
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS2.378 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8096

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Minimum recommended system powerno data500 Watt
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
PhysX-+
3D Vision Live-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX Vega M GL 12.38
GTX 760 12.45
+0.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX Vega M GL 4768
GTX 760 4795
+0.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro WX Vega M GL 10020
+25.8%
GTX 760 7962

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro WX Vega M GL 7333
+23.1%
GTX 760 5959

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro WX Vega M GL 38986
GTX 760 40150
+3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
−33.3%
68
+33.3%
4K15
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.66
4Kno data17.79

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 33
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−3%
30−35
+3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−2.5%
80−85
+2.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−1.6%
65−70
+1.6%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−2.5%
40−45
+2.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−3%
30−35
+3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65
+62.5%
40−45
−62.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−3%
30−35
+3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−2.5%
80−85
+2.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−1.6%
65−70
+1.6%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−2.5%
40−45
+2.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−3%
30−35
+3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
−70.6%
27−30
+70.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−2.5%
80−85
+2.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−1.6%
65−70
+1.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−29.2%
30−35
+29.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−3%
30−35
+3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−5.2%
60−65
+5.2%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−5.3%
20−22
+5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−5.3%
20−22
+5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−4%
75−80
+4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−5.4%
55−60
+5.4%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how Pro WX Vega M GL and GTX 760 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 760 is 33% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX Vega M GL is 7% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro WX Vega M GL is 63% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 760 is 71% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro WX Vega M GL is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • GTX 760 is ahead in 42 tests (58%)
  • there's a draw in 26 tests (36%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.38 12.45
Recency 24 April 2018 25 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 170 Watt

Pro WX Vega M GL has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 161.5% lower power consumption.

GTX 760, on the other hand, has a 0.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and GeForce GTX 760.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 760 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2114 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.