GeForce GTX 750 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Place in the ranking	401	494
Place by popularity	not in top-100	77
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	4.59
Power efficiency	13.08	10.83
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	Polaris 22	GM107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	24 April 2018 (6 years ago)	18 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	512
Core clock speed	931 MHz	1020 MHz
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz	1085 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	95 °C
Texture fill rate	80.88	34.72
Floating-point processing power	2.588 TFLOPS	1.111 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	80	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	5.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor support	no data	3 displays
HDMI	-	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	-	+
3D Gaming	-	+
3D Vision	-	+
3D Vision Live	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX Vega M GL 12.38
+42.6%

GTX 750 8.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX Vega M GL 4768
+42.7%

GTX 750 3342

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro WX Vega M GL 7333
+84.7%

GTX 750 3970

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	51 +45.7%	35−40 −45.7%
4K	15 +50%	10−12 −50%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.40
4K	no data	11.90

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20
+58.3%

12−14

−58.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	33 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +58.3%	24−27 −58.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +45.5%	55−60 −45.5%
Hitman 3	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +60%	40−45 −60%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65 +44.4%	45−50 −44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +53.3%	45−50 −53.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +58.3%	24−27 −58.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +45.5%	55−60 −45.5%
Hitman 3	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +60%	40−45 −60%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +53.3%	45−50 −53.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	17 +70%	10−11 −70%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +45.5%	55−60 −45.5%
Hitman 3	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +60%	40−45 −60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24 +50%	16−18 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +53.3%	45−50 −53.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+57.1%

21−24

−57.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +45%	40−45 −45%
Hitman 3	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +50%	50−55 −50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22
+42.9%

14−16

−42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Hitman 3	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +60%	35−40 −60%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 +50%	10−11 −50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%