GeForce GTX 750 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL with GeForce GTX 750, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
12.41
+42.8%

Pro WX Vega M GL outperforms GTX 750 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking403500
Place by popularitynot in top-10087
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.60
Power efficiency13.1410.88
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code namePolaris 22GM107
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date24 April 2018 (6 years ago)18 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280512
Core clock speed931 MHz1020 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data95 °C
Texture fill rate80.8834.72
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS1.111 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz5.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data3 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
3D Vision Live-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX Vega M GL 12.41
+42.8%
GTX 750 8.69

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX Vega M GL 4768
+42.8%
GTX 750 3338

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro WX Vega M GL 7333
+84.7%
GTX 750 3970

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
1440p8
+60%
5−6
−60%
4K18
+50%
12−14
−50%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.40
1440pno data23.80
4Kno data9.92

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Valorant 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Dota 2 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
Fortnite 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 123
+44.7%
85−90
−44.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Valorant 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
World of Tanks 170−180
+54.5%
110−120
−54.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Dota 2 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Valorant 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+43.6%
55−60
−43.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
World of Tanks 85−90
+46.7%
60−65
−46.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Valorant 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Dota 2 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 34
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Fortnite 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Valorant 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%

This is how Pro WX Vega M GL and GTX 750 compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX Vega M GL is 57% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX Vega M GL is 60% faster in 1440p
  • Pro WX Vega M GL is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.41 8.69
Recency 24 April 2018 18 February 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

Pro WX Vega M GL has a 42.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 750, on the other hand, has 18.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GeForce GTX 750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2373 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.