Radeon Vega 7 vs Pro WX 7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 7100 with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 7100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
17.47
+171%

Pro WX 7100 outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking286548
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.95no data
Power efficiency10.6911.38
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameEllesmereCezanne
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304448
Core clock speed1188 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate179.053.20
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs14428

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+161%
23
−161%
1440p75−80
+168%
28
−168%
4K45−50
+150%
18
−150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.32no data
1440p10.65no data
4K17.76no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+194%
16−18
−194%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+221%
30−35
−221%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+122%
18
−122%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+194%
16−18
−194%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+182%
28
−182%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+221%
30−35
−221%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+186%
14
−186%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+220%
20
−220%
Fortnite 100−110
+60.3%
63
−60.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+111%
37
−111%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+154%
24
−154%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+177%
24−27
−177%
Valorant 140−150
+90.7%
75−80
−90.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+194%
16−18
−194%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+243%
23
−243%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+221%
30−35
−221%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+295%
58
−295%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+300%
10
−300%
Dota 2 100−110
+209%
35−40
−209%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+256%
18
−256%
Fortnite 100−110
+274%
27
−274%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+123%
35
−123%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+190%
21
−190%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+318%
17
−318%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+215%
13
−215%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+213%
23
−213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+184%
19
−184%
Valorant 140−150
+95.9%
73
−95.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+276%
21
−276%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+344%
9
−344%
Dota 2 100−110
+209%
35−40
−209%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+256%
18
−256%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+189%
27
−189%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+177%
24−27
−177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+315%
13
−315%
Valorant 140−150
+472%
25
−472%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+621%
14
−621%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+264%
10−12
−264%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+154%
50−55
−154%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+336%
35−40
−336%
Valorant 170−180
+273%
48
−273%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+315%
12−14
−315%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+207%
14−16
−207%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+182%
16−18
−182%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+182%
10−12
−182%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+214%
14−16
−214%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Valorant 100−110
+332%
25
−332%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Dota 2 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+200%
10−12
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is 161% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX 7100 is 168% faster in 1440p
  • Pro WX 7100 is 150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro WX 7100 surpassed Vega 7 in all 58 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.47 6.44
Recency 10 November 2016 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 45 Watt

Pro WX 7100 has a 171.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 188.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 58 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2467 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 7100 or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.