Radeon RX 6650M XT vs Quadro NVS 5100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 5100M with Radeon RX 6650M XT, including specs and performance data.

NVS 5100M
2010
1 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
0.82

RX 6650M XT outperforms NVS 5100M by a whopping 4607% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1174110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.8825.87
ArchitectureGT2xx (2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameN10P-NSNavi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed550 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2416 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data309.2
Floating-point processing powerno data9.896 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4750%
95−100
+4750%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1533%
95−100
+1533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4750%
95−100
+4750%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−13000%
130−140
+13000%
Fortnite 0−1 170−180
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2533%
150−160
+2533%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1533%
95−100
+1533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1888%
150−160
+1888%
Valorant 30−33
−687%
230−240
+687%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−1109%
270−280
+1109%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4750%
95−100
+4750%
Dota 2 14−16
−943%
140−150
+943%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−13000%
130−140
+13000%
Fortnite 0−1 170−180
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2533%
150−160
+2533%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1533%
95−100
+1533%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−9800%
95−100
+9800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1888%
150−160
+1888%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2383%
140−150
+2383%
Valorant 30−33
−687%
230−240
+687%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4750%
95−100
+4750%
Dota 2 14−16
−943%
140−150
+943%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−13000%
130−140
+13000%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2533%
150−160
+2533%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1533%
95−100
+1533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1888%
150−160
+1888%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2383%
140−150
+2383%
Valorant 30−33
−687%
230−240
+687%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 170−180

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3433%
100−110
+3433%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−5660%
280−290
+5660%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1844%
170−180
+1844%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 45−50
Far Cry 5 0−1 100−105
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−5850%
110−120
+5850%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−4800%
45−50
+4800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−507%
90−95
+507%
Valorant 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2800%
55−60
+2800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6650M XT is 13000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT performs better in 37 tests (61%)
  • there's a draw in 24 tests (39%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.82 38.60
Recency 7 January 2010 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 120 Watt

NVS 5100M has 242.9% lower power consumption.

RX 6650M XT, on the other hand, has a 4607.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 5100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 5100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6650M XT is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
Quadro NVS 5100M
AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 76 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 5100M or Radeon RX 6650M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.