ATI Radeon 9200 vs GeForce FX Go 5200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce FX Go 5200 with Radeon 9200, including specs and performance data.
FX Go 5200 outperforms ATI 9200 by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1498 | 1528 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.02 |
| Architecture | no data | Rage 7 (2001−2006) |
| GPU code name | NV31M | RV280 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 March 2003 (21 year ago) | 1 May 2003 (21 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 36 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 28 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 1.000 |
| ROPs | no data | 4 |
| TMUs | no data | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | AGP 8x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 6.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DDR | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 1.4 |
| OpenCL | no data | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+100%
|
12−14
−100%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+100%
|
12−14
−100%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+100%
|
12−14
−100%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+114%
|
7−8
−114%
|
| Valorant | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Recency | 1 March 2003 | 1 May 2003 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 128 MB |
FX Go 5200 has a 100% higher aggregate performance score.
ATI 9200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The GeForce FX Go 5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce FX Go 5200 is a notebook card while Radeon 9200 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
