Quadro P4000 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 7100 with Quadro P4000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 7100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
18.82

P4000 Mobile outperforms Pro WX 7100 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking288285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.208.23
Power efficiency10.5913.98
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameEllesmereGP104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)11 January 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 $819.61

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Pro WX 7100 and P4000 Mobile have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041792
Core clock speed1188 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHz1228 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate179.0137.4
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPS4.398 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs144112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s192 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Display Portno data1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−1.3%
80−85
+1.3%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Fortnite 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+4%
75−80
−4%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Valorant 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−1.3%
80−85
+1.3%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+8%
100−105
−8%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Fortnite 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+4%
75−80
−4%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Valorant 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−1.3%
80−85
+1.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+8%
100−105
−8%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+4%
75−80
−4%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Valorant 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−1.4%
140−150
+1.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0.6%
170−180
−0.6%
Valorant 170−180
−0.6%
180−190
+0.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+8%
100−105
−8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.82 19.10
Recency 10 November 2016 11 January 2017
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 100 Watt

Pro WX 7100 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

P4000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and 30% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro WX 7100 and Quadro P4000 Mobile.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation card while Quadro P4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile
Quadro P4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 59 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 24 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 7100 or Quadro P4000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.