Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	160	252
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	10.71
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code name	GP104	Polaris 12
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799
Current price	no data	$582 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	2304
Core clock speed	1316 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1569 MHz	1243 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	251.0	179.0
Floating-point performance	no data	5,728 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P5200 Max-Q and Radeon Pro WX 7100 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7216 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	230.9 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P5200 Max-Q 31.99
+56.4%

Pro WX 7100 20.45

Quadro P5200 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 7100 by 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

P5200 Max-Q 12355
+56.4%

Pro WX 7100 7898

Quadro P5200 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 7100 by 56% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35
+57.1%

21−24

−57.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +66.7%	24−27 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +67.5%	40−45 −67.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +70.8%	24−27 −70.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +60%	30−33 −60%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +67.3%	55−60 −67.3%
Hitman 3	40−45 +66.7%	24−27 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +62%	50−55 −62%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +70%	40−45 −70%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +60%	35−40 −60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +67.5%	40−45 −67.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +74.3%	35−40 −74.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +66.7%	24−27 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +67.5%	40−45 −67.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +70.8%	24−27 −70.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +60%	30−33 −60%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +67.3%	55−60 −67.3%
Hitman 3	40−45 +66.7%	24−27 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +62%	50−55 −62%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +70%	40−45 −70%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +60%	35−40 −60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +67.5%	40−45 −67.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +66.7%	27−30 −66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +74.3%	35−40 −74.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +66.7%	24−27 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +70.8%	24−27 −70.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +60%	30−33 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +67.3%	55−60 −67.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +62%	50−55 −62%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +67.5%	40−45 −67.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +66.7%	27−30 −66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +74.3%	35−40 −74.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+60%

35−40

−60%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +70.8%	24−27 −70.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +75%	12−14 −75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +62.5%	16−18 −62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +61.9%	21−24 −61.9%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +66.7%	24−27 −66.7%
Hitman 3	24−27 +71.4%	14−16 −71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +75%	24−27 −75%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +58.3%	24−27 −58.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +75%	24−27 −75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +71.4%	14−16 −71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+61.9%

21−24

−61.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Hitman 3	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +75%	12−14 −75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +75%	16−18 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
+80%

10−11

−80%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	31.99	20.45
Recency	21 February 2018	1 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	130 Watt