Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	167	272
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	8.04
Power efficiency	22.55	10.80
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GP104	Ellesmere
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)	10 November 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	2304
Core clock speed	1316 MHz	1188 MHz
Boost clock speed	1569 MHz	1243 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	251.0	179.0
Floating-point processing power	8.033 TFLOPS	5.728 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	160	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1804 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	230.9 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P5200 Max-Q 32.68
+60.6%

Pro WX 7100 20.35

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P5200 Max-Q 12568
+60.6%

Pro WX 7100 7826

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Elden Ring	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Dota 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Elden Ring	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Fortnite	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
World of Tanks	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Dota 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Elden Ring	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
World of Tanks	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Dota 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Elden Ring	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Fortnite	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.68	20.35
Recency	21 February 2018	10 November 2016
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	130 Watt

P5200 Max-Q has a 60.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 30% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 7100, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 7100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.