Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Instinct MI6 Radeon Pro Duo Polaris Radeon Pro V7300X Radeon Pro V7350X2 Radeon Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 7100 with Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 7100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
20.22
+167%

Pro WX 7100 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by a whopping 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro WX 7100 Pro WX 7100
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking281538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.37no data
Power efficiency10.6718.57
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameEllesmereTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230480
Core clock speed1188 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate179.0no data
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs144no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+150%
20
−150%
1440p24−27
+140%
10
−140%
4K35−40
+150%
14
−150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.98no data
1440p33.29no data
4K22.83no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+122%
23
−122%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+227%
11
−227%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+186%
14
−186%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+219%
16
−219%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+204%
26
−204%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+300%
9
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+233%
12
−233%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+220%
20
−220%
Fortnite 100−110
+135%
40−45
−135%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+141%
30−35
−141%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+279%
14
−279%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+177%
24−27
−177%
Valorant 140−150
+86.8%
75−80
−86.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+325%
12
−325%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+243%
23
−243%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+260%
10
−260%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+100%
110−120
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+300%
10
−300%
Dota 2 100−110
+177%
39
−177%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+237%
19
−237%
Fortnite 100−110
+135%
40−45
−135%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+141%
30−35
−141%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+212%
16−18
−212%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+446%
13
−446%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+242%
12
−242%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+177%
24−27
−177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+145%
22
−145%
Valorant 140−150
+86.8%
75−80
−86.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+243%
23
−243%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+620%
5
−620%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+344%
9
−344%
Dota 2 100−110
+200%
36
−200%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+256%
18
−256%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+141%
30−35
−141%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+489%
9
−489%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+177%
24−27
−177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+391%
11
−391%
Valorant 140−150
+86.8%
75−80
−86.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+135%
40−45
−135%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+149%
55−60
−149%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+450%
6
−450%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+330%
40−45
−330%
Valorant 170−180
+121%
80−85
−121%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+286%
14−16
−286%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+200%
6
−200%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+258%
12
−258%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+182%
16−18
−182%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+183%
12−14
−183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+210%
10
−210%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+214%
14−16
−214%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Valorant 100−110
+200%
35−40
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Dota 2 65−70
+306%
16
−306%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+200%
10−12
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is 150% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX 7100 is 140% faster in 1440p
  • Pro WX 7100 is 150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is ahead in 66 tests (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 20.22 7.58
Recency 10 November 2016 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 28 Watt

Pro WX 7100 has a 166.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 364.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
FirePro W9100 FirePro W9100
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
T1000 8 GB T1000 8 GB
GTX 680M GeForce GTX 680M
vs
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT
FirePro M6100 FirePro M6100
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
RX 570 Radeon RX 570
vs
GeForce 6600 GeForce 6600
GeForce 945M GeForce 945M
vs
Arc Pro A60M Arc Pro A60M
RX 6550M RX 6550M
vs
RX 580 Mobile RX 580 Mobile
Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
Instinct MI50 Radeon Instinct MI50
ATI Mobility 9000 IGP Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP
vs
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
G 107M GeForce G 107M
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
K5100M Quadro K5100M
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 58 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 947 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 7100 or Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.