HD Graphics 4000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 7100 with HD Graphics 4000, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 7100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
20.31
+1621%

Pro WX 7100 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by a whopping 1621% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2701066
Place by popularitynot in top-10050
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.71no data
Power efficiency10.711.80
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameEllesmereIvy Bridge GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304128
Core clock speed1188 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate179.016.00
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPS0.256 TFLOPS
ROPs322
TMUs14416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.0
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 7100 20.31
+1621%
HD Graphics 4000 1.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 7100 7825
+1624%
HD Graphics 4000 454

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p200−210
+1567%
12
−1567%
Full HD170−180
+1600%
10
−1600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.70no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+2133%
3−4
−2133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+12500%
1−2
−12500%
Hitman 3 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+600%
14−16
−600%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+1675%
4−5
−1675%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+750%
8−9
−750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+191%
30−35
−191%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+2133%
3−4
−2133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+12500%
1−2
−12500%
Hitman 3 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+600%
14−16
−600%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+1675%
4−5
−1675%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+750%
8−9
−750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+254%
13
−254%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+191%
30−35
−191%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+12500%
1−2
−12500%
Hitman 3 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+600%
14−16
−600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+750%
8−9
−750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+318%
10−12
−318%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+191%
30−35
−191%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+1800%
6−7
−1800%
Hitman 3 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+950%
4−5
−950%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+2300%
5−6
−2300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 0−1
Hitman 3 16−18 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+1667%
6−7
−1667%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and HD Graphics 4000 compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is 1567% faster in 900p
  • Pro WX 7100 is 1600% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 12500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro WX 7100 surpassed HD Graphics 4000 in all 47 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.31 1.18
Recency 10 November 2016 14 May 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm

Pro WX 7100 has a 1621.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation card while HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 55 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 5277 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.