GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

Place in performance ranking	254	198
Place by popularity	not in top-100	71
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.51	no data
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 12	GN20-P1
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	10 May 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	no data
Current price	$582 (0.7x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2560
Core clock speed	no data	1222 MHz
Boost clock speed	1243 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	179.0	118.8
Floating-point performance	5,728 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX 7100 and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	no data	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	60−65 −25%	75 +25%
1440p	30−35 −40%	42 +40%
4K	21−24 −23.8%	26 +23.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35

−93.8%

62
+93.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −19.5%	45−50 +19.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −66.7%	60 +66.7%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −58.8%	108 +58.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −24.5%	65−70 +24.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −84.4%	59 +84.4%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −49.1%	79 +49.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −52.7%	84 +52.7%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −18.6%	80−85 +18.6%
Hitman 3	55−60 −78%	105 +78%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −51.2%	65 +51.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −130%	76 +130%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −116%	95 +116%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −51.3%	59 +51.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −19.5%	45−50 +19.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +2.9%	35 −2.9%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −44.1%	98 +44.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −24.5%	65−70 +24.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −40.6%	45 +40.6%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −39.6%	74 +39.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −49.1%	82 +49.1%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −18.6%	80−85 +18.6%
Hitman 3	55−60 −50.8%	89 +50.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −30.2%	56 +30.2%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −72.7%	57 +72.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −18.2%	39 +18.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −72.7%	76 +72.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −109%	92 +109%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −41%	55 +41%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −19.5%	45−50 +19.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +38.5%	26 −38.5%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −30.9%	89 +30.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −25%	40 +25%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −28.3%	68 +28.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −32.7%	73 +32.7%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −18.6%	80−85 +18.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −13.6%	50 +13.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +39.3%	28 −39.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −22.6%	35−40 +22.6%
Hitman 3	30−35 −87.9%	62 +87.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −92.6%	52 +92.6%
Metro Exodus	20−22 −70%	34 +70%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −26.7%	18−20 +26.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −69.2%	44 +69.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −36.8%	26 +36.8%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −53.3%	69 +53.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −83.3%	22 +83.3%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −47.1%	50 +47.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −53.8%	60 +53.8%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −24.4%	50−55 +24.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −30.4%	30−33 +30.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −42.9%	20 +42.9%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −26.7%	18−20 +26.7%
Hitman 3	18−20 −73.7%	33 +73.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −75%	21 +75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −18.2%	12−14 +18.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −46.2%	19 +46.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −38.1%	29 +38.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −65.2%	38 +65.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10 +150%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −23.5%	21 +23.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 −40%	28 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −11.1%	10 +11.1%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 25% faster than Pro WX 7100 in 1080p
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 40% faster than Pro WX 7100 in 1440p
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 23.8% faster than Pro WX 7100 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 39.3% faster than the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 150% faster than the Pro WX 7100.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro WX 7100 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 65 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.37	25.01
Recency	1 March 2017	10 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	60 Watt