GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 7100 with GeForce GTX 660M, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 7100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
17.48
+440%

Pro WX 7100 outperforms GTX 660M by a whopping 440% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking287725
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.97no data
Power efficiency10.675.14
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameEllesmereGK107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)22 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304384
Core clock speed1188 MHz835 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate179.030.40
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPS0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs14432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s64.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 7100 17.48
+440%
GTX 660M 3.24

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 7100 7809
+440%
GTX 660M 1447

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Pro WX 7100 39388
+873%
GTX 660M 4048

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p160−170
+433%
30
−433%
Full HD180−190
+414%
35
−414%
1200p200−210
+426%
38
−426%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.44no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+456%
9−10
−456%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+808%
12−14
−808%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+456%
9−10
−456%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+508%
12−14
−508%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+808%
12−14
−808%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+700%
8−9
−700%
Fortnite 100−110
+405%
20−22
−405%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+359%
16−18
−359%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+663%
8−9
−663%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+380%
14−16
−380%
Valorant 140−150
+180%
50−55
−180%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+456%
9−10
−456%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+508%
12−14
−508%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+808%
12−14
−808%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+157%
89
−157%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Dota 2 100−110
+227%
30−35
−227%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+700%
8−9
−700%
Fortnite 100−110
+405%
20−22
−405%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+359%
16−18
−359%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+663%
8−9
−663%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+545%
10−12
−545%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+380%
14−16
−380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
Valorant 140−150
+180%
50−55
−180%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+508%
12−14
−508%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Dota 2 100−110
+227%
30−35
−227%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+700%
8−9
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+359%
16−18
−359%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+380%
14−16
−380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
Valorant 140−150
+180%
50−55
−180%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+405%
20−22
−405%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+427%
24−27
−427%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+486%
27−30
−486%
Valorant 170−180
+397%
35−40
−397%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+617%
6−7
−617%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+500%
8−9
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+520%
5−6
−520%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+529%
7−8
−529%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Valorant 100−110
+500%
18−20
−500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Dota 2 65−70
+491%
10−12
−491%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and GTX 660M compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is 433% faster in 900p
  • Pro WX 7100 is 414% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX 7100 is 426% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro WX 7100 surpassed GTX 660M in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.48 3.24
Recency 10 November 2016 22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 50 Watt

Pro WX 7100 has a 439.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 660M, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 660M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
GeForce GTX 660M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 58 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 214 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 7100 or GeForce GTX 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.