FirePro W5130M vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

Place in the ranking	277	721
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.01	no data
Power efficiency	10.77	no data
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	Ellesmere	Tropo
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	10 November 2016 (8 years ago)	2 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	512
Core clock speed	1188 MHz	900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1243 MHz	925 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	179.0	29.60
Floating-point processing power	5.728 TFLOPS	0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	144	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
Eyefinity	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	+
FreeSync	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 7100 19.41
+455%

W5130M 3.50

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 7100 7817
+455%

W5130M 1409

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Pro WX 7100 39388
+658%

W5130M 5198

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

130−140
+420%

−420%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

6.15

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +300%	9−10 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +413%	8−9 −413%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +540%	10−11 −540%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +300%	9−10 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +413%	8−9 −413%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +406%	16−18 −406%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +980%	5−6 −980%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +588%	8−9 −588%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +292%	12−14 −292%
Valorant	80−85 +1071%	7−8 −1071%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +540%	10−11 −540%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +300%	9−10 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +413%	8−9 −413%
Dota 2	70−75 +555%	10−12 −555%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +235%	20−22 −235%
Fortnite	100−110 +410%	21−24 −410%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +406%	16−18 −406%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +980%	5−6 −980%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 +545%	10−12 −545%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +588%	8−9 −588%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +325%	30−35 −325%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +292%	12−14 −292%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +392%	12−14 −392%
Valorant	80−85 +1071%	7−8 −1071%
World of Tanks	230−240 +271%	60−65 −271%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +540%	10−11 −540%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +300%	9−10 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +413%	8−9 −413%
Dota 2	70−75 +555%	10−12 −555%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +235%	20−22 −235%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +406%	16−18 −406%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +980%	5−6 −980%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +325%	30−35 −325%
Valorant	80−85 +1071%	7−8 −1071%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +1500%	2−3 −1500%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +1000%	3−4 −1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +372%	24−27 −372%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
World of Tanks	130−140 +431%	24−27 −431%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +925%	4−5 −925%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +588%	8−9 −588%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +1225%	4−5 −1225%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +475%	8−9 −475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +314%	7−8 −314%
Valorant	50−55 +382%	10−12 −382%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	35−40 +119%	16−18 −119%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +113%	16−18 −113%
Metro Exodus	14−16	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +510%	10−11 −510%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +113%	16−18 −113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Dota 2	35−40 +119%	16−18 −119%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +550%	4−5 −550%
Fortnite	24−27 +1100%	2−3 −1100%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +1400%	2−3 −1400%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
Valorant	24−27 +700%	3−4 −700%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and W5130M compete in popular games:

Pro WX 7100 is 420% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro WX 7100 is ahead in 59 tests (97%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.41	3.50
Recency	10 November 2016	2 October 2015
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm

Pro WX 7100 has a 454.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W5130M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation card while FirePro W5130M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.