FirePro W5130M vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 7100 with FirePro W5130M, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 7100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
19.87
+455%

Pro WX 7100 outperforms W5130M by a whopping 455% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking280724
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.19no data
Power efficiency10.73no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameEllesmereTropo
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)2 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304512
Core clock speed1188 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate179.029.60
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPS0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs14432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 7100 19.87
+455%
W5130M 3.58

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 7100 7818
+455%
W5130M 1409

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Pro WX 7100 39388
+658%
W5130M 5198

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+420%
25
−420%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.15no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+467%
9−10
−467%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+260%
10−11
−260%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+467%
9−10
−467%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+508%
12−14
−508%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+260%
10−11
−260%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+713%
8−9
−713%
Fortnite 100−110
+432%
18−20
−432%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+388%
16−18
−388%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+380%
14−16
−380%
Valorant 140−150
+186%
50−55
−186%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+467%
9−10
−467%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+508%
12−14
−508%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+260%
10−11
−260%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+265%
60−65
−265%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Dota 2 100−110
+238%
30−35
−238%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+713%
8−9
−713%
Fortnite 100−110
+432%
18−20
−432%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+388%
16−18
−388%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+610%
10−11
−610%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+380%
14−16
−380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+440%
10
−440%
Valorant 140−150
+186%
50−55
−186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+508%
12−14
−508%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+260%
10−11
−260%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Dota 2 100−110
+238%
30−35
−238%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+713%
8−9
−713%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+388%
16−18
−388%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+380%
14−16
−380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
Valorant 140−150
+186%
50−55
−186%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+432%
18−20
−432%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+431%
24−27
−431%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+562%
24−27
−562%
Valorant 180−190
+414%
35−40
−414%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+500%
9−10
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+617%
6−7
−617%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+500%
8−9
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+520%
5−6
−520%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+633%
6−7
−633%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Valorant 100−110
+535%
16−18
−535%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Dota 2 65−70
+491%
10−12
−491%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and W5130M compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is 420% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro WX 7100 surpassed W5130M in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.87 3.58
Recency 10 November 2016 2 October 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

Pro WX 7100 has a 455% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W5130M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation card while FirePro W5130M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
AMD FirePro W5130M
FirePro W5130M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 58 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 69 votes

Rate FirePro W5130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 7100 or FirePro W5130M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.