Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 7100 with Arc Graphics 140V, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 7100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
19.04
+49.2%

Pro WX 7100 outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking297407
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.21no data
Power efficiency10.55no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameEllesmereLunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23048
Core clock speed1188 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1243 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate179.0no data
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs144no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 7100 19.04
+49.2%
Arc Graphics 140V 12.76

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 7100 7795
+49.2%
Arc Graphics 140V 5223

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
+37.5%
40
−37.5%
1440p30−35
+30.4%
23
−30.4%
4K40−45
+37.9%
29
−37.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.53no data
1440p26.63no data
4K19.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 40−45
+0%
40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+24.1%
87
−24.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+53.8%
24−27
−53.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 40−45
+29%
31
−29%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+43.6%
55−60
−43.6%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+27.1%
85
−27.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+53.8%
24−27
−53.8%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+21.2%
52
−21.2%
Fortnite 100−110
+36.5%
70−75
−36.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+44.4%
50−55
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+56.5%
45−50
−56.5%
Valorant 140−150
+30%
110−120
−30%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 40−45
+42.9%
28
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+43.6%
55−60
−43.6%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+157%
42
−157%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+29.2%
170−180
−29.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+53.8%
24−27
−53.8%
Dota 2 100−110
+54.3%
70−75
−54.3%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+34%
47
−34%
Fortnite 100−110
+36.5%
70−75
−36.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+44.4%
50−55
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+61.4%
44
−61.4%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+57.7%
24−27
−57.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+56.5%
45−50
−56.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−17%
62
+17%
Valorant 140−150
+30%
110−120
−30%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 40−45
+48.1%
27
−48.1%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+43.6%
55−60
−43.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+53.8%
24−27
−53.8%
Dota 2 100−110
+54.3%
70−75
−54.3%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+43.2%
44
−43.2%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+44.4%
50−55
−44.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+56.5%
45−50
−56.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+89.3%
28
−89.3%
Valorant 140−150
+30%
110−120
−30%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+36.5%
70−75
−36.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+62.5%
24−27
−62.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+45.3%
95−100
−45.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+77.8%
18
−77.8%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+55.5%
110−120
−55.5%
Valorant 170−180
+31.6%
130−140
−31.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 24−27
+25%
20
−25%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+16.2%
37
−16.2%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+54.8%
30−35
−54.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+63.2%
18−20
−63.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+57.1%
27−30
−57.1%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Valorant 100−110
+56.5%
65−70
−56.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Dota 2 65−70
+62.5%
40−45
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+50%
21−24
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is 38% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX 7100 is 30% faster in 1440p
  • Pro WX 7100 is 38% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 157% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 140V is 17% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is ahead in 61 tests (97%)
  • Arc Graphics 140V is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.04 12.76
Recency 10 November 2016 24 September 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm

Pro WX 7100 has a 49.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation card while Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 60 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 37 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 7100 or Arc Graphics 140V, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.