ATI FireGL V5200 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking364not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.11no data
Power efficiency13.38no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameEllesmereRV530
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date18 November 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Core clock speed713 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1086 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate121.62.400
Floating-point processing power3.892 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 November 2016 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

Pro WX 5100 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V5200, on the other hand, has 114.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 5100 and FireGL V5200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
Radeon Pro WX 5100
ATI FireGL V5200
FireGL V5200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 94 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate FireGL V5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.