Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB vs Pro WX 4150
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4150 with Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, including specs and performance data.
9060 XT 16GB outperforms Pro 4150 by a whopping 838% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 632 | 47 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 9.50 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | RDNA 4 (2025) |
| GPU code name | Baffin | no data |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 March 2017 (9 years ago) | 2 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 896 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | 2530 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 58.97 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.887 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | no data |
| TMUs | 56 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 16−18
−894%
| 159
+894%
|
| 1440p | 7−8
−914%
| 71
+914%
|
| 4K | 4−5
−975%
| 43
+975%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
−870%
|
290−300
+870%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−1008%
|
140−150
+1008%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 10−12
−1482%
|
170−180
+1482%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−511%
|
160−170
+511%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
−870%
|
290−300
+870%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−1008%
|
140−150
+1008%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−1250%
|
270
+1250%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
−611%
|
270−280
+611%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−711%
|
220−230
+711%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 18−20
−889%
|
170−180
+889%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−657%
|
170−180
+657%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−360%
|
300−350
+360%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−511%
|
160−170
+511%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
−870%
|
290−300
+870%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
−171%
|
270−280
+171%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−1008%
|
140−150
+1008%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
−800%
|
450−500
+800%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−1140%
|
248
+1140%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
−611%
|
270−280
+611%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−711%
|
220−230
+711%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 18−20
−889%
|
170−180
+889%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
−600%
|
154
+600%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
−1133%
|
140−150
+1133%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−657%
|
170−180
+657%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−1506%
|
273
+1506%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−360%
|
300−350
+360%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−511%
|
160−170
+511%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−1008%
|
140−150
+1008%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
−800%
|
450−500
+800%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−1065%
|
233
+1065%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−711%
|
220−230
+711%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−657%
|
170−180
+657%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−759%
|
146
+759%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−829%
|
650−700
+829%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 35−40
−611%
|
270−280
+611%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
−1333%
|
170−180
+1333%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 45−50
−815%
|
400−450
+815%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6−7
−1283%
|
83
+1283%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
−1483%
|
95−100
+1483%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−797%
|
350−400
+797%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−439%
|
350−400
+439%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−1340%
|
140−150
+1340%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−1500%
|
80−85
+1500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−1233%
|
160
+1233%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−1167%
|
190−200
+1167%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−1033%
|
102
+1033%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
−1062%
|
150−160
+1062%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−435%
|
91
+435%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−5900%
|
60−65
+5900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−2000%
|
84
+2000%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−932%
|
300−350
+932%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−1940%
|
100−110
+1940%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1800%
|
35−40
+1800%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−809%
|
200−210
+809%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1500%
|
80
+1500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−1456%
|
140−150
+1456%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−1500%
|
95−100
+1500%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 6−7
−1217%
|
75−80
+1217%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
This is how Pro WX 4150 and RX 9060 XT 16GB compete in popular games:
- RX 9060 XT 16GB is 894% faster in 1080p
- RX 9060 XT 16GB is 914% faster in 1440p
- RX 9060 XT 16GB is 975% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 9060 XT 16GB is 5900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 9060 XT 16GB performs better in 53 tests (98%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (2%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.17 | 57.90 |
| Recency | 1 March 2017 | 2 January 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
RX 9060 XT 16GB has a 838% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
