Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4150 with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4150
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.31

7-Cores iGPU outperforms Pro 4150 by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking619378
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.68no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameBaffinMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2017 (8 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8967
Core clock speed1002 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1053 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate58.97no data
Floating-point processing power1.887 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs56no data
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−183%
34
+183%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−190%
90
+190%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−146%
32
+146%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−158%
31
+158%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 27−30
−143%
65−70
+143%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−87.1%
58
+87.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−108%
27
+108%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−90%
38
+90%
Fortnite 35−40
−126%
85−90
+126%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−124%
65−70
+124%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−172%
45−50
+172%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−125%
27
+125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−146%
55−60
+146%
Valorant 70−75
−78.9%
120−130
+78.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 27−30
−143%
65−70
+143%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
31
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−96.2%
200−210
+96.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−76.9%
23
+76.9%
Dota 2 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−70%
34
+70%
Fortnite 35−40
−126%
85−90
+126%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−124%
65−70
+124%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−172%
45−50
+172%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
23
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−41.7%
17
+41.7%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−175%
30−35
+175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−146%
55−60
+146%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−206%
52
+206%
Valorant 70−75
−78.9%
120−130
+78.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
−143%
65−70
+143%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−69.2%
22
+69.2%
Dota 2 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−75%
35
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−124%
65−70
+124%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−8.3%
13
+8.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−146%
55−60
+146%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−29.4%
22
+29.4%
Valorant 70−75
−139%
170−180
+139%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
−126%
85−90
+126%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−158%
30−35
+158%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−137%
110−120
+137%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Valorant 70−75
−118%
150−160
+118%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
−300%
40−45
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−153%
35−40
+153%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−70.6%
27−30
+70.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Valorant 30−35
−172%
85−90
+172%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Dota 2 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 183% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU performs better in 56 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.31 15.48
Recency 1 March 2017 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 145.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 26 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 109 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4150 or Arc 7-Cores iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.