Radeon R9 M390 vs Pro WX 4150

Place in the ranking	558	457
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	9.54	no data
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	GCN (2012−2015)
GPU code name	Baffin	Pitcairn
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	9 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	1024
Core clock speed	1002 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1053 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,000 million	5000 Million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	58.97	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.887 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	56	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Bus support	no data	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
Eyefinity	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	+
HD3D	-	+
PowerTune	-	+
DualGraphics	-	+
ZeroCore	-	+
Switchable graphics	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	DirectX® 12
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	2.0	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
Mantle	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	30−35 −46.7%	44 +46.7%
4K	14−16 −50%	21 +50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −35.7%	18−20 +35.7%
Elden Ring	18−20 −55.6%	27−30 +55.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −45.5%	30−35 +45.5%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −35.7%	18−20 +35.7%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −39.3%	35−40 +39.3%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −50%	27−30 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −30%	24−27 +30%
Valorant	21−24 −68.2%	35−40 +68.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −45.5%	30−35 +45.5%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −35.7%	18−20 +35.7%
Dota 2	24−27 +9.1%	22 −9.1%
Elden Ring	18−20 −55.6%	27−30 +55.6%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −32.3%	40−45 +32.3%
Fortnite	40−45 −41.5%	55−60 +41.5%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −39.3%	35−40 +39.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −41.7%	34 +41.7%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −50%	27−30 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −37.5%	75−80 +37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −30%	24−27 +30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −57.1%	33 +57.1%
Valorant	21−24 −68.2%	35−40 +68.2%
World of Tanks	100−110 −33.6%	140−150 +33.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −45.5%	30−35 +45.5%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −35.7%	18−20 +35.7%
Dota 2	24−27 −45.8%	35−40 +45.8%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −32.3%	40−45 +32.3%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −39.3%	35−40 +39.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −37.5%	75−80 +37.5%
Valorant	21−24 −68.2%	35−40 +68.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Elden Ring	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −23.7%	45−50 +23.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
World of Tanks	50−55 −42%	70−75 +42%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −69.2%	21−24 +69.2%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −90%	18−20 +90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Valorant	18−20 −38.9%	24−27 +38.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Dota 2	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
Elden Ring	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −17.6%	20−22 +17.6%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −45%	27−30 +45%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −17.6%	20−22 +17.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Dota 2	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Fortnite	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Valorant	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and R9 M390 compete in popular games:

R9 M390 is 47% faster in 1080p
R9 M390 is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 4150 is 9% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M390 is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games: