Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Radeon Pro 570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 570 with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Pro 570
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
16.41

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms Pro 570 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking308292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.94no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Xe LPG
GPU code namePolaris 20Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date5 June 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$356 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17927
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1105 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate123.8no data
Floating-point performance3,584 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 570 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed6780 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth217.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−13.3%
34
+13.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−14%
55−60
+14%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−8.6%
38
+8.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−17.5%
45−50
+17.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−8%
80−85
+8%
Hitman 3 30−33
−13.3%
30−35
+13.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−15%
65−70
+15%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−6.7%
45−50
+6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−12%
55−60
+12%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−8%
50−55
+8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−14%
55−60
+14%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−13.3%
34
+13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−17.5%
45−50
+17.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−8%
80−85
+8%
Hitman 3 30−33
−13.3%
30−35
+13.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−15%
65−70
+15%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−16%
55−60
+16%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−6.7%
45−50
+6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−12%
55−60
+12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−15.6%
52
+15.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−8%
50−55
+8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−14%
55−60
+14%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−16.7%
35
+16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−17.5%
45−50
+17.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−8%
80−85
+8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−22.2%
22
+22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−8%
50−55
+8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
Hitman 3 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−6.7%
30−35
+6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−13.3%
30−35
+13.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−13.3%
30−35
+13.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−13.3%
30−35
+13.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−13.3%
30−35
+13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Hitman 3 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

This is how Pro 570 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 13% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.41 17.43
Recency 5 June 2017 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 570 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 570 is a mobile workstation card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 51 vote

Rate Radeon Pro 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.