Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Pro WX 4130

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4130 with Radeon RX 6500 XT, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4130
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
5.62

RX 6500 XT outperforms Pro WX 4130 by a whopping 341% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking599218
Place by popularitynot in top-10085
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data58.33
Power efficiency7.7816.04
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameBaffinNavi 24
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2017 (7 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401024
Core clock speed1002 MHz2610 MHz
Boost clock speed1053 MHz2815 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt107 Watt
Texture fill rate42.12180.2
Floating-point processing power1.348 TFLOPS5.765 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4064
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2248 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s143.9 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4130 5.62
RX 6500 XT 24.80
+341%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4130 2168
RX 6500 XT 9565
+341%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−350%
63
+350%
1440p6−7
−400%
30
+400%
4K3−4
−467%
17
+467%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.16
1440pno data6.63
4Kno data11.71

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−700%
72
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−286%
50−55
+286%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−750%
51
+750%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−479%
80−85
+479%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−500%
54
+500%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−418%
55−60
+418%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−339%
140−150
+339%
Hitman 3 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−245%
110−120
+245%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−554%
85−90
+554%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−357%
60−65
+357%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−342%
80−85
+342%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−119%
100−110
+119%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−286%
50−55
+286%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−617%
43
+617%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−479%
80−85
+479%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−278%
34
+278%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−418%
55−60
+418%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−339%
140−150
+339%
Hitman 3 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−245%
110−120
+245%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−554%
85−90
+554%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−357%
60−65
+357%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−463%
107
+463%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−194%
50−55
+194%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−119%
100−110
+119%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−286%
50−55
+286%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−417%
31
+417%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−233%
30
+233%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−418%
55−60
+418%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−339%
140−150
+339%
Hitman 3 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−179%
92
+179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−337%
83
+337%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−200%
54
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+88%
25
−88%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−357%
60−65
+357%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−370%
45−50
+370%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−375%
35−40
+375%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 23
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−750%
17
+750%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−367%
27−30
+367%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−985%
140−150
+985%
Hitman 3 9−10
−222%
27−30
+222%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−450%
66
+450%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1800%
57
+1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−324%
140−150
+324%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−356%
40−45
+356%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%
Hitman 3 1−2
−900%
10
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−1311%
120−130
+1311%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2700%
28
+2700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−200%
6
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4
Far Cry 5 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−580%
30−35
+580%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−400%
10
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 56
+0%
56
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25
+0%
25
+0%

This is how Pro WX 4130 and RX 6500 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6500 XT is 350% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6500 XT is 400% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6500 XT is 467% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 4130 is 88% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6500 XT is 2700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro WX 4130 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RX 6500 XT is ahead in 67 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.62 24.80
Recency 1 March 2017 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 107 Watt

Pro WX 4130 has 114% lower power consumption.

RX 6500 XT, on the other hand, has a 341.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4130 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130
Radeon Pro WX 4130
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 3222 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.