NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Pro WX 4100
9.69
+18.3%

Radeon Pro WX 4100 outperforms Tesla C2050 by 18% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking423471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.143.21
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameBaffinGF100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 November 2016 (7 years old)25 July 2011 (12 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data
Current price$711 (1.8x MSRP)$70
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla C2050 has 50% better value for money than Pro WX 4100.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024448
Core clock speed1125 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt238 Watt
Texture fill rate76.8632.14
Floating-point performance2,460 gflops1,030.4 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s144.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDAno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4100 9.69
+18.3%
Tesla C2050 8.19

Radeon Pro WX 4100 outperforms Tesla C2050 by 18% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 4100 3756
+18.3%
Tesla C2050 3175

Radeon Pro WX 4100 outperforms Tesla C2050 by 18% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 9.69 8.19
Recency 10 November 2016 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 238 Watt

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla C2050 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Tesla C2050

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 42 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16 votes

Rate NVIDIA Tesla C2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.