GeForce G102M vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking461not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.63no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBaffinC79
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (7 years ago)8 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102416
CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed1125 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate76.863.600
Floating-point processing power2.46 gflops0.0352 gflops
Gigaflopsno data48
ROPs164
TMUs648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 1.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortVGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4100 3641
+2080%
GeForce G102M 167

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2016 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 14 Watt

Pro WX 4100 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G102M, on the other hand, has 257.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 4100 and GeForce G102M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce G102M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
NVIDIA GeForce G102M
GeForce G102M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 47 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 40 votes

Rate GeForce G102M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.