GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 3200 with GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 3200
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
6.28

RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Pro WX 3200 by a whopping 1216% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5815
Place by popularitynot in top-10091
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.6148.24
Power efficiency6.6720.01
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 23AD104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 July 2019 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 Ti has 283% better value for money than Pro WX 3200.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6407680
Core clock speed1082 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate34.62626.4
Floating-point processing power1.385 TFLOPS40.09 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs32240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 3200 6.28
RTX 4070 Ti 82.64
+1216%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 3200 2414
RTX 4070 Ti 31776
+1216%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro WX 3200 4338
RTX 4070 Ti 75612
+1643%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Pro WX 3200 12538
RTX 4070 Ti 135624
+982%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro WX 3200 3156
RTX 4070 Ti 53360
+1591%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro WX 3200 18866
RTX 4070 Ti 217200
+1051%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro WX 3200 105833
RTX 4070 Ti 815367
+670%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Pro WX 3200 22
RTX 4070 Ti 291
+1223%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Pro WX 3200 40
RTX 4070 Ti 119
+193%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Pro WX 3200 32
+64.9%
RTX 4070 Ti 19

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Pro WX 3200 28
RTX 4070 Ti 193
+597%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Pro WX 3200 34
RTX 4070 Ti 99
+189%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Pro WX 3200 8
RTX 4070 Ti 154
+1795%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Pro WX 3200 18
RTX 4070 Ti 245
+1281%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Pro WX 3200 2
RTX 4070 Ti 48
+2919%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−1183%
231
+1183%
1440p10−12
−1400%
150
+1400%
4K9
−967%
96
+967%

Cost per frame, $

1080p11.06
−220%
3.46
+220%
1440p19.90
−274%
5.33
+274%
4K22.11
−166%
8.32
+166%
  • RTX 4070 Ti has 220% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti has 274% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti has 166% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1271%
190−200
+1271%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1867%
236
+1867%
Elden Ring 16−18
−1581%
269
+1581%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−485%
110−120
+485%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1271%
190−200
+1271%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−808%
109
+808%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−2112%
575
+2112%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−981%
173
+981%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−761%
150−160
+761%
Valorant 18−20
−2495%
450−500
+2495%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−485%
110−120
+485%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1271%
190−200
+1271%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−675%
93
+675%
Dota 2 16
−1181%
205
+1181%
Elden Ring 16−18
−1950%
300−350
+1950%
Far Cry 5 15
−913%
152
+913%
Fortnite 35−40
−732%
300−350
+732%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1719%
473
+1719%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−748%
178
+748%
Metro Exodus 4
−3975%
163
+3975%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−313%
210−220
+313%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−761%
150−160
+761%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−770%
170−180
+770%
Valorant 18−20
−2495%
450−500
+2495%
World of Tanks 95−100
−182%
270−280
+182%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−485%
110−120
+485%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1271%
190−200
+1271%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−592%
83
+592%
Dota 2 35
−594%
243
+594%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−441%
150−160
+441%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1477%
410
+1477%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−313%
210−220
+313%
Valorant 18−20
−2495%
450−500
+2495%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6−7
−2500%
156
+2500%
Elden Ring 8−9
−2900%
240−250
+2900%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−2500%
156
+2500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−373%
170−180
+373%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1760%
90−95
+1760%
World of Tanks 45−50
−1047%
500−550
+1047%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−691%
85−90
+691%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1211%
110−120
+1211%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−960%
53
+960%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1131%
160−170
+1131%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−2445%
280
+2445%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1750%
148
+1750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2700%
190−200
+2700%
Valorant 16−18
−2450%
400−450
+2450%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−912%
172
+912%
Elden Ring 3−4
−4367%
130−140
+4367%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−912%
172
+912%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−4100%
84
+4100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−1061%
200−210
+1061%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1500%
60−65
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−912%
172
+912%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1720%
90−95
+1720%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24
+1100%
Dota 2 9
−2411%
226
+2411%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1400%
100−110
+1400%
Fortnite 6−7
−1500%
95−100
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2233%
140
+2233%
Valorant 6−7
−3900%
240−250
+3900%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

This is how Pro WX 3200 and RTX 4070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti is 1183% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 1400% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 967% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Elden Ring, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti is 4367% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti is ahead in 61 test (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.28 82.64
Recency 2 July 2019 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 285 Watt

Pro WX 3200 has 338.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 1215.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 85 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7176 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.