Radeon RX 570 vs Pro W6600X
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro W6600X with Radeon RX 570, including specs and performance data.
Pro W6600X outperforms RX 570 by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 188 | 343 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 24 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 21.06 | 12.18 |
Power efficiency | 19.86 | 10.56 |
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
GPU code name | Navi 23 | Polaris 20 |
Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 3 August 2021 (4 years ago) | 18 April 2017 (8 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $169 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Pro W6600X has 73% better value for money than RX 570.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 2068 MHz | 1168 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2479 MHz | 1244 MHz |
Number of transistors | 11,060 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 317.3 | 159.2 |
Floating-point processing power | 10.15 TFLOPS | 5.095 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 64 | 32 |
TMUs | 128 | 128 |
Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 241 mm |
Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
FreeSync | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.3 | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 150−160
+76.5%
| 85
−76.5%
|
1440p | 90−95
+87.5%
| 48
−87.5%
|
4K | 55−60
+83.3%
| 30
−83.3%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 4.66
−134%
| 1.99
+134%
|
1440p | 7.77
−121%
| 3.52
+121%
|
4K | 12.71
−126%
| 5.63
+126%
|
- RX 570 has 134% lower cost per frame in 1080p
- RX 570 has 121% lower cost per frame in 1440p
- RX 570 has 126% lower cost per frame in 4K
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
God of War | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 88
+0%
|
88
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 77
+0%
|
77
+0%
|
Fortnite | 238
+0%
|
238
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 100
+0%
|
100
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
God of War | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 96
+0%
|
96
+0%
|
Valorant | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 75
+0%
|
75
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 70
+0%
|
70
+0%
|
Fortnite | 95
+0%
|
95
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 94
+0%
|
94
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
God of War | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 73
+0%
|
73
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 43
+0%
|
43
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 87
+0%
|
87
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 77
+0%
|
77
+0%
|
Valorant | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 68
+0%
|
68
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 65
+0%
|
65
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 75
+0%
|
75
+0%
|
God of War | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 69
+0%
|
69
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 43
+0%
|
43
+0%
|
Valorant | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 72
+0%
|
72
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 25
+0%
|
25
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
Valorant | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 52
+0%
|
52
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 46
+0%
|
46
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 59
+0%
|
59
+0%
|
God of War | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 45
+0%
|
45
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 30
+0%
|
30
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 28
+0%
|
28
+0%
|
Valorant | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 31
+0%
|
31
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24
+0%
|
24
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 39
+0%
|
39
+0%
|
God of War | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27
+0%
|
27
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 23
+0%
|
23
+0%
|
This is how Pro W6600X and RX 570 compete in popular games:
- Pro W6600X is 76% faster in 1080p
- Pro W6600X is 88% faster in 1440p
- Pro W6600X is 83% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 31.29 | 16.63 |
Recency | 3 August 2021 | 18 April 2017 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Pro W6600X has a 88.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Pro W6600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 570 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600X is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 570 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.