GeForce RTX 5090 vs Radeon Pro W6600X

Place in the ranking	159	6
Place by popularity	not in top-100	58
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	54.35	8.97
Power efficiency	19.58	9.98
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code name	Navi 23	GB202
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	3 August 2021 (3 years ago)	30 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W6600X has 506% better value for money than RTX 5090.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	21760
Core clock speed	2068 MHz	2017 MHz
Boost clock speed	2479 MHz	2407 MHz
Number of transistors	11,060 million	92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	575 Watt
Texture fill rate	317.3	1,637
Floating-point processing power	10.15 TFLOPS	104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	176
TMUs	128	680
Tensor Cores	no data	680
Ray Tracing Cores	32	170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 5.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	1.79 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.4
CUDA	-	10.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6600X 33.69

RTX 5090 82.26
+144%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6600X 13113

RTX 5090 32021
+144%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	80−85 −159%	207 +159%
1440p	75−80 −145%	184 +145%
4K	55−60 −156%	141 +156%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	8.74 +10.5%	9.66 −10.5%
1440p	9.32 +16.6%	10.86 −16.6%
4K	12.71 +11.6%	14.18 −11.6%

Pro W6600X has 11% lower cost per frame in 1080p
Pro W6600X has 17% lower cost per frame in 1440p
Pro W6600X has 12% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

6−7

+0%

6−7

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	159 +0%	159 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
World of Tanks	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	202 +0%	202 +0%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

183

+0%

183

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Valorant	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	174 +0%	174 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	167 +0%	167 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	55 +0%	55 +0%
Valorant	0−1	0−1

This is how Pro W6600X and RTX 5090 compete in popular games:

RTX 5090 is 159% faster in 1080p
RTX 5090 is 145% faster in 1440p
RTX 5090 is 156% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 19 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.69	82.26
Recency	3 August 2021	30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	575 Watt

Pro W6600X has 379.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 144.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6600X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600X is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.