UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon Pro W5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pro W5700
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 205 Watt
39.29
+1176%

Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by a whopping 1176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking101723
Place by popularitynot in top-10029
Cost-effectiveness evaluation40.390.35
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Gen. 9.5 (2017)
GPU code nameNavi 10Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 November 2019 (4 years ago)1 October 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data
Current price$748 (0.9x MSRP)$457

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W5700 has 11440% better value for money than UHD Graphics 630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230424
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1930 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate277.926.45
Floating-point performanceno data460.8 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.103

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W5700 39.29
+1176%
UHD Graphics 630 3.08

Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 1176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro W5700 15189
+1174%
UHD Graphics 630 1192

Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 1174% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD240−250
+1163%
19
−1163%
1440p120−130
+1100%
10
−1100%
4K85−90
+1114%
7
−1114%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.29 3.08
Recency 19 November 2019 1 October 2017
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 15 Watt

The Radeon Pro W5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 86 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3533 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.