Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs Radeon Pro W5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro W5500 Pro W5500X Pro W5700 Pro W5700X Pro W6400 Pro W6600 Pro W6600X Pro W6800 Pro W6800X Pro W6800X Duo Pro W6900X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3000 Mobile 3000 Max-Q 3000 Mobile Refresh 3000 X2 Mobile 4000 Mobile 4000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile 5000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile Refresh 5000 X2 Mobile 6000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W5700 with Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro W5700
2019, $799
8 GB GDDR6, 205 Watt
34.22
+5.3%

Pro W5700 outperforms RTX 5000 Mobile by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro W5700 Pro W5700
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking163181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.14no data
Power efficiency12.8722.77
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 10TU104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date19 November 2019 (6 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23043072
Core clock speed1243 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1930 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate277.9296.6
Floating-point processing power8.893 TFLOPS9.492 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
−1.5%
132
+1.5%
1440p85−90
+1.2%
84
−1.2%
4K55−60
+1.9%
54
−1.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.15no data
1440p9.40no data
4K14.53no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 165
+0%
165
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 128
+0%
128
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 162
+0%
162
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120
+0%
120
+0%
Far Cry 5 123
+0%
123
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+0%
181
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 152
+0%
152
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 111
+0%
111
+0%
Far Cry 5 115
+0%
115
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+0%
100
+0%
Valorant 181
+0%
181
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how Pro W5700 and RTX 5000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 2% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W5700 is 1% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W5700 is 2% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 34.22 32.50
Recency 19 November 2019 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 110 Watt

Pro W5700 has a 5.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 5000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 86.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro W5700 and Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro W5700 Radeon Pro W5700
vs
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Pro W5700 Radeon Pro W5700
vs
Pro W6800X Duo Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GTX 1660 Super NVIDIA GTX 1660 Super
vs
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile 1000 Ada Generation Mobile
GTX 1660 Super NVIDIA GTX 1660 Super
vs
H100 NVL 94 GB 94 GB
Pro W5700 AMD Pro W5700
vs
NVS 810 810
Pro W5700 AMD Pro W5700
vs
Pro 560 560
Pro W5700 AMD Pro W5700
vs
Pro 575X 575X
Pro W5700 AMD Pro W5700
vs
RTX 3060 Max-Q 3060 Max-Q
RX 5300 XT AMD RX 5300 XT
vs
RTX A4500 A4500
RX 5300 XT AMD RX 5300 XT
vs
UHD Graphics 24EU 24EU
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB
vs
RX 5300 XT 5300 XT
RX 5500 AMD RX 5500
vs
R9 M380 M380

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 117 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 50 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5700 or Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.