GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5700

Place in performance ranking	101	44
Place by popularity	not in top-100	18
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	41.69	44.60
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 10	Ampere GA104
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	19 November 2019 (4 years ago)	1 December 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	$399
Current price	$748 (0.9x MSRP)	$361 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3060 Ti has 7% better value for money than Pro W5700.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	4864
Core clock speed	no data	1410 MHz
Boost clock speed	1930 MHz	1665 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	220 Watt
Texture fill rate	277.9	253.1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	305 mm	242 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	no data	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W5700 39.35

RTX 3060 Ti 53.17
+35.1%

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro W5700 by 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro W5700 15196

RTX 3060 Ti 20537
+35.1%

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro W5700 by 35% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110 −38%	138 +38%
1440p	55−60 −47.3%	81 +47.3%
4K	35−40 −45.7%	51 +45.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

−38.3%

83
+38.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −42.4%	121 +42.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 −35.7%	95 +35.7%
Battlefield 5	120−130 −40.8%	160−170 +40.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −37.3%	100−110 +37.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −47.3%	81 +47.3%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −40%	100−110 +40%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 −35.8%	120−130 +35.8%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −42.9%	200 +42.9%
Hitman 3	75−80 −41.3%	100−110 +41.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −38.2%	152 +38.2%
Metro Exodus	95−100 −37.9%	130−140 +37.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −41.3%	110−120 +41.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	160−170 −37.5%	220 +37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −35.6%	122 +35.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −38.7%	104 +38.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −47.3%	81 +47.3%
Battlefield 5	120−130 −40.8%	160−170 +40.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −37.3%	100−110 +37.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −41.8%	78 +41.8%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −40%	100−110 +40%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 −35.8%	120−130 +35.8%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −39.2%	180−190 +39.2%
Hitman 3	35−40 −45.7%	51 +45.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 −38.1%	220−230 +38.1%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −37.5%	55 +37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −41.3%	110−120 +41.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 −37.1%	192 +37.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 −42.3%	185 +42.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −36.5%	110−120 +36.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −36.4%	75 +36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 −48%	74 +48%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −37.3%	100−110 +37.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −40%	77 +40%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −40%	100−110 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −44.2%	173 +44.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −40%	140 +40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 −45%	174 +45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −41.5%	92 +41.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −40%	77 +40%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
−41.3%

110−120

+41.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 −37.5%	110−120 +37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 −37.8%	120−130 +37.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −44.4%	65 +44.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −50%	60 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 −40%	80−85 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −48.6%	52 +48.6%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −40%	105 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −36.4%	150 +36.4%
Hitman 3	50−55 −48%	70−75 +48%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −42.5%	114 +42.5%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −43.1%	93 +43.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −39%	139 +39%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −45%	85−90 +45%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −47.5%	59 +47.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70

−40%

90−95
+40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −45%	55−60 +45%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −40%	45−50 +40%
Hitman 3	40−45 −42.5%	57 +42.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −48%	70−75 +48%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −40%	56 +40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −40%	77 +40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −50%	45 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −48.1%	40 +48.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −37%	35−40 +37%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −38.9%	25 +38.9%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −41.7%	30−35 +41.7%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −37.3%	103 +37.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −42%	71 +42%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −40%	63 +40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −37.5%	33 +37.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−45.7%

50−55
+45.7%

This is how Pro W5700 and RTX 3060 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 3060 Ti is 38% faster in 1080p
RTX 3060 Ti is 47% faster in 1440p
RTX 3060 Ti is 46% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	39.35	53.17
Recency	19 November 2019	1 December 2020
Cost	$799	$399
Chip lithography	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	220 Watt