GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs Radeon Pro W5700
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro W5700 with GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
Pro W5700 outperforms RTX 2070 Mobile by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 165 | 197 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 16.28 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 12.90 | 21.02 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Navi 10 | TU106B |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 29 January 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1305 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 10,300 million | 10,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 | 213.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 8.893 TFLOPS | 6.843 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 288 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 36 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 305 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 130−140
+8.3%
| 120
−8.3%
|
| 1440p | 80−85
+5.3%
| 76
−5.3%
|
| 4K | 50−55
+4.2%
| 48
−4.2%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 6.15 | no data |
| 1440p | 9.99 | no data |
| 4K | 15.98 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 120
+0%
|
120
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 122
+0%
|
122
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 188
+0%
|
188
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 113
+0%
|
113
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 196
+0%
|
196
+0%
|
| Valorant | 234
+0%
|
234
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 134
+0%
|
134
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 124
+0%
|
124
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 113
+0%
|
113
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 149
+0%
|
149
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 112
+0%
|
112
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 115
+0%
|
115
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 69
+0%
|
69
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 173
+0%
|
173
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 142
+0%
|
142
+0%
|
| Valorant | 230
+0%
|
230
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 121
+0%
|
121
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 117
+0%
|
117
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 106
+0%
|
106
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 94
+0%
|
94
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130
+0%
|
130
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 74
+0%
|
74
+0%
|
| Valorant | 154
+0%
|
154
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 141
+0%
|
141
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230
+0%
|
220−230
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 42
+0%
|
42
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
| Valorant | 229
+0%
|
229
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 92
+0%
|
92
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 76
+0%
|
76
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 94
+0%
|
94
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 26
+0%
|
26
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50
+0%
|
50
+0%
|
| Valorant | 202
+0%
|
202
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 52
+0%
|
52
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40
+0%
|
40
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 46
+0%
|
46
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 46
+0%
|
46
+0%
|
This is how Pro W5700 and RTX 2070 Mobile compete in popular games:
- Pro W5700 is 8% faster in 1080p
- Pro W5700 is 5% faster in 1440p
- Pro W5700 is 4% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 34.14 | 31.21 |
| Recency | 19 November 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 115 Watt |
Pro W5700 has a 9.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.
RTX 2070 Mobile, on the other hand, has 78.3% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro W5700 and GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile.
Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
