Radeon Pro W6600 vs GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

Place in the ranking	148	105
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	73.48
Power efficiency	20.79	27.66
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU106B	Navi 23
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	29 January 2019 (6 years ago)	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1792
Core clock speed	1305 MHz	2331 MHz
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz	2903 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	213.8	325.1
Floating-point processing power	6.843 TFLOPS	10.4 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	144	112
Tensor Cores	288	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	36	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	7.5	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	120 −8.3%	130−140 +8.3%
1440p	75 −13.3%	85−90 +13.3%
4K	48 −14.6%	55−60 +14.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.99
1440p	no data	7.64
4K	no data	11.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −14.3%	80−85 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −9.6%	80−85 +9.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95 −5.3%	100−105 +5.3%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −14.3%	80−85 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	38 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
Forza Horizon 4	183 −14.8%	210−220 +14.8%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 −11.1%	100−105 +11.1%
Metro Exodus	94 −6.4%	100−105 +6.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	106 −13.2%	120−130 +13.2%
Valorant	170 −11.8%	190−200 +11.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	135 −11.1%	150−160 +11.1%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −14.3%	80−85 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	31 −12.9%	35−40 +12.9%
Dota 2	118 −10.2%	130−140 +10.2%
Far Cry 5	79 −13.9%	90−95 +13.9%
Fortnite	150−160 −13.9%	180−190 +13.9%
Forza Horizon 4	149 −14.1%	170−180 +14.1%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 −11.1%	100−105 +11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	115 −13%	130−140 +13%
Metro Exodus	73 −9.6%	80−85 +9.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	248 −12.9%	280−290 +12.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55 −9.1%	60−65 +9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 −8.3%	130−140 +8.3%
Valorant	102 −7.8%	110−120 +7.8%
World of Tanks	270−280 −7.9%	300−310 +7.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	83 −14.5%	95−100 +14.5%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −14.3%	80−85 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	26 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Dota 2	117 −11.1%	130−140 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −8.7%	100−105 +8.7%
Forza Horizon 4	125 −12%	140−150 +12%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 −11.1%	100−105 +11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	104 −15.4%	120−130 +15.4%
Valorant	154 −10.4%	170−180 +10.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	60−65 −11.1%	70−75 +11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 −11.1%	70−75 +11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −14.3%	200−210 +14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35 −14.3%	40−45 +14.3%
World of Tanks	220−230 −13.1%	250−260 +13.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	72 −11.1%	80−85 +11.1%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −2.9%	35−40 +2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −9.1%	120−130 +9.1%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −13.4%	110−120 +13.4%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 −14%	65−70 +14%
Metro Exodus	74 −14.9%	85−90 +14.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −14%	65−70 +14%
Valorant	104 −15.4%	120−130 +15.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −14.3%	40−45 +14.3%
Dota 2	65−70 −15.4%	75−80 +15.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 −15.4%	75−80 +15.4%
Metro Exodus	26 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	118 −10.2%	130−140 +10.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	23 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −15.4%	75−80 +15.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	38 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −14.3%	40−45 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	8 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Dota 2	65−70 −15.4%	75−80 +15.4%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −12.2%	55−60 +12.2%
Fortnite	48 −14.6%	55−60 +14.6%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −7.1%	60−65 +7.1%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −12.9%	35−40 +12.9%
Valorant	55 −9.1%	60−65 +9.1%

This is how RTX 2070 Mobile and Pro W6600 compete in popular games:

Pro W6600 is 8% faster in 1080p
Pro W6600 is 13% faster in 1440p
Pro W6600 is 15% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	34.67	40.11
Recency	29 January 2019	8 June 2021
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	100 Watt

Pro W6600 has a 15.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 15% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon Pro W6600 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.