Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 vs Pro W5500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W5500M with Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5, including specs and performance data.

Pro W5500M
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
8.30
+833%

Pro W5500M outperforms HD 6450 GDDR5 by a whopping 833% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5521191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.522.54
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameNavi 14Caicos
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date10 February 2020 (6 years ago)18 April 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408160
Core clock speed1000 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate127.6no data
Floating-point processing power4.083 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs88no data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p65−70
+829%
7
−829%
Full HD130−140
+767%
15
−767%
1200p45−50
+800%
5
−800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 29
+0%
29
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Pro W5500M and HD 6450 GDDR5 compete in popular games:

  • Pro W5500M is 829% faster in 900p
  • Pro W5500M is 767% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W5500M is 800% faster in 1200p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 35 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.30 0.89
Recency 10 February 2020 18 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 27 Watt

Pro W5500M has a 833% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

HD 6450 GDDR5, on the other hand, has 215% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5500M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 27 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5500M or Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.