Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile vs Radeon Pro W5500M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking483not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.27no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameNavi 14Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date10 February 2020 (4 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408384
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate127.643.20
Floating-point processing power4.083 TFLOPS1.382 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs8824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 28 Watt

Pro W5500M has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 203.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5500M and Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5500M is a mobile workstation card while Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M
Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.