Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro W5500

Place in performance ranking	215	295
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	46.22	8.60
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 14	TU117
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	10 February 2020 (4 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data
Current price	$308 (0.8x MSRP)	$920

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W5500 has 437% better value for money than Quadro T1000.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	no data
Core clock speed	no data	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	1400 MHz	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	123.2	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	no data
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort

No outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W5500 23.62
+38.6%

Quadro T1000 17.04

Radeon Pro W5500 outperforms Quadro T1000 by 39% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro W5500 9146
+38.6%

Quadro T1000 6597

Radeon Pro W5500 outperforms Quadro T1000 by 39% in Passmark.