Quadro P620 vs Radeon Pro W5500

Place in performance ranking	217	438
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	47.86	21.31
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 14	GP107
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	10 February 2020 (4 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data
Current price	$308 (0.8x MSRP)	$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W5500 has 125% better value for money than Quadro P620.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	512
Core clock speed	no data	1177 MHz
Boost clock speed	1400 MHz	1442 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	123.2	43.33
Floating-point performance	no data	1,490 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	145 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	80.13 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort

4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W5500 23.61
+151%

Quadro P620 9.41

Radeon Pro W5500 outperforms Quadro P620 by 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro W5500 9120
+151%

Quadro P620 3633

Radeon Pro W5500 outperforms Quadro P620 by 151% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

130−140
+136%

−136%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40
+133%

14−16

−133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +137%	18−20 −137%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Battlefield 5	70−75 +141%	27−30 −141%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +137%	18−20 −137%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +133%	14−16 −133%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +150%	21−24 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +150%	24−27 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +139%	45−50 −139%
Hitman 3	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 +150%	40−45 −150%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +143%	35 −143%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +150%	24−27 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 +141%	27−30 −141%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +150%	30−35 −150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +137%	18−20 −137%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Battlefield 5	70−75 +141%	27−30 −141%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +137%	18−20 −137%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +133%	14−16 −133%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +150%	21−24 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +150%	24−27 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +139%	45−50 −139%
Hitman 3	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 +150%	40−45 −150%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +131%	13 −131%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +150%	24−27 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 +141%	27−30 −141%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +150%	32 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +150%	30−35 −150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +137%	18−20 −137%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +137%	18−20 −137%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +133%	14−16 −133%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +150%	21−24 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +139%	45−50 −139%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 +150%	40−45 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 +141%	27−30 −141%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +135%	17 −135%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +150%	30−35 −150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70
+150%

24−27

−150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +133%	14−16 −133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +145%	10−12 −145%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +133%	14−16 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +135%	16−18 −135%
Hitman 3	30−33 +131%	12−14 −131%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +150%	20−22 −150%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +131%	12−14 −131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +145%	10−12 −145%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+150%

16−18

−150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Hitman 3	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

+133%

9−10
−133%

This is how Pro W5500 and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

Pro W5500 is 136% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	23.61	9.41
Recency	10 February 2020	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	25 Watt