Quadro K2200 vs Radeon Pro W5500

Place in performance ranking	215	441
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	46.27	2.89
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	Navi 14	GM107
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	10 February 2020 (4 years ago)	22 July 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	$395.75
Current price	$308 (0.8x MSRP)	$313 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W5500 has 1501% better value for money than Quadro K2200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	640
Core clock speed	no data	1046 MHz
Boost clock speed	1400 MHz	1124 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	68 Watt
Texture fill rate	123.2	44.96
Floating-point performance	no data	1,439 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm	202 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	80.19 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	no data	5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W5500 23.63
+158%

Quadro K2200 9.17

Radeon Pro W5500 outperforms Quadro K2200 by 158% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro W5500 9146
+158%

Quadro K2200 3551

Radeon Pro W5500 outperforms Quadro K2200 by 158% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	23.63	9.17
Recency	10 February 2020	22 July 2014
Cost	$399	$395.75
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	68 Watt