H100 SXM5 96 GB vs Radeon Pro W5500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking235not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation42.92no data
Power efficiency13.15no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Hopper (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 14GH100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 February 2020 (4 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140816896
Core clock speed1187 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz1837 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate123.2969.9
Floating-point processing power3.942 TFLOPS62.08 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs88528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB96 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s1,681 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.5N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 700 Watt

Pro W5500 has 460% lower power consumption.

H100 SXM5 96 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5500 and H100 SXM5 96 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon Pro W5500
NVIDIA H100 SXM5 96 GB
H100 SXM5 96 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 52 votes

Rate H100 SXM5 96 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.