GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro W5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro W5500 Pro W5500X Pro W5700 Pro W5700X Pro W6400 Pro W6600 Pro W6600X Pro W6800 Pro W6800X Pro W6800X Duo Pro W6900X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1050 Mobile 1050 3 GB Max-Q 1050 Max-Q 1050 Mobile 3 GB 1050 Ti Mobile 1050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W5500 with GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro W5500
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
20.20
+101%

Pro W5500 outperforms 1050 Mobile by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro W5500 Pro W5500
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking294470
Place by popularitynot in top-10075
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.42no data
Power efficiency13.0510.83
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 14GP107B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 February 2020 (5 years ago)3 January 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408640
Core clock speed1187 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate123.259.72
Floating-point processing power3.942 TFLOPS1.911 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8840
L1 Cacheno data240 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4000 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDCP-2.2
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream-+
GPU Boostno data3.0
Ansel-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p140−150
+91.8%
73
−91.8%
Full HD90−95
+95.7%
46
−95.7%
1440p45−50
+87.5%
24
−87.5%
4K30−35
+100%
15
−100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.43no data
1440p8.87no data
4K13.30no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 132
+0%
132
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+0%
55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 46
+0%
46
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Dota 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Fortnite 51
+0%
51
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+0%
52
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 42
+0%
42
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+0%
41
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
+0%
29
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 39
+0%
39
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+0%
26
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 25
+0%
25
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 11
+0%
11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
+0%
12
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10
+0%
10
+0%

This is how Pro W5500 and GTX 1050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Pro W5500 is 92% faster in 900p
  • Pro W5500 is 96% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W5500 is 88% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W5500 is 100% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 38 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 20.20 10.06
Recency 10 February 2020 3 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4000 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 75 Watt

Pro W5500 has a 100.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 104.8% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1050 Mobile, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon Pro W5500
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
vs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
vs
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
ATI FireGL T2-64S 64S
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
Pro 5300 5300
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
RX 9070 XT 9070 XT
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
vs
RTX 4090 4090
Playstation 5 GPU AMD 5 GPU
vs
GTX 1650 TU116 1650 TU116
Pro W5500 AMD Pro W5500
vs
Pro 5500 XT 5500 XT
RX 5600 XT AMD RX 5600 XT
vs
M2000M M2000M
RX 5600 XT AMD RX 5600 XT
vs
GTX 570 570
RX 5600 XT AMD RX 5600 XT
vs
GT 640 640
RTX 4070 4070
vs
RX 5800 XT 5800 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 89 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1472 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5500 or GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.