Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Pro Vega II

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega II with Radeon RX 6500 XT, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega II
2019
32 GB HBM2, 475 Watt
40.38
+63.5%

Pro Vega II outperforms RX 6500 XT by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking93204
Place by popularitynot in top-10083
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.45
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2021)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameVega 20Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,199 $199
Current price$9999 (4.5x MSRP)$274 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega II and RX 6500 XT have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961024
Core clock speed1574 MHz2610 MHz
Boost clock speed1720 MHz2815 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)475 Watt107 Watt
Texture fill rate440.3180.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXPCIe 4.0 x4
WidthQuad-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1612 MBps18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth825.3 GB/s143.9 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega II 40.38
+63.5%
RX 6500 XT 24.70

Pro Vega II outperforms RX 6500 XT by 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega II 15596
+63.5%
RX 6500 XT 9539

Pro Vega II outperforms RX 6500 XT by 63% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
+55.7%
61
−55.7%
1440p50−55
+56.3%
32
−56.3%
4K27−30
+58.8%
17
−58.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+52.8%
72
−52.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+59.6%
45−50
−59.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+56.9%
51
−56.9%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+60.5%
80−85
−60.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+60%
50−55
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+57.4%
54
−57.4%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+57.9%
55−60
−57.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−105
+53.8%
65−70
−53.8%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+58.9%
100−110
−58.9%
Hitman 3 80−85
+60%
50−55
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 280−290
+59.1%
176
−59.1%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+62.5%
80−85
−62.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+51.5%
65−70
−51.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200−210
+56.3%
128
−56.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+62.2%
74
−62.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+59.6%
45−50
−59.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+62.8%
43
−62.8%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+60.5%
80−85
−60.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+60%
50−55
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+61.8%
34
−61.8%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+57.9%
55−60
−57.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−105
+53.8%
65−70
−53.8%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+58.9%
100−110
−58.9%
Hitman 3 35−40
+52.2%
23
−52.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+63.3%
95−100
−63.3%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+55.6%
45
−55.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+51.5%
65−70
−51.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+58.9%
107
−58.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+63%
92
−63%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+57.1%
70−75
−57.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+59.6%
45−50
−59.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+61.3%
31
−61.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+60%
50−55
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+50%
30
−50%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+57.9%
55−60
−57.9%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+58.9%
100−110
−58.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+63%
92
−63%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+56.6%
83
−56.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+57.4%
54
−57.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+60%
25
−60%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+51.5%
65−70
−51.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+59.6%
45−50
−59.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+63.5%
50−55
−63.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+53.8%
24−27
−53.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+52.2%
23
−52.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+51.5%
30−35
−51.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+58.8%
17
−58.8%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+57.9%
57
−57.9%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+63.3%
45−50
−63.3%
Hitman 3 45−50
+55.2%
27−30
−55.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+51.5%
66
−51.5%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+57.9%
57
−57.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+60.7%
56
−60.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+57.9%
19
−57.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+58.5%
40−45
−58.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Hitman 3 16−18
+60%
10
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+60.7%
27−30
−60.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+50%
16
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+60.7%
28
−60.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+50%
6
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4
−50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+61.8%
30−35
−61.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+56.3%
32
−56.3%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+50%
20
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+60%
10
−60%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%

This is how Pro Vega II and RX 6500 XT compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega II is 56% faster in 1080p
  • Pro Vega II is 56% faster in 1440p
  • Pro Vega II is 59% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.38 24.70
Recency 3 June 2019 19 January 2022
Cost $2199 $199
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 475 Watt 107 Watt

The Radeon Pro Vega II is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6500 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega II is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Radeon Pro Vega II
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 80 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 3030 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.