Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs Pro Vega 64X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro Vega 16 Pro Vega 20 Pro Vega 48 Pro Vega 56 Pro Vega 64 Pro Vega 64X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Steam Deck 8CU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 64X with Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega 64X
2019
16 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
31.59
+690%

Pro 64X outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 690% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro Vega 64X Pro Vega 64X
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking192730
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
Power efficiency9.79no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameVega 10Raphael
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date19 March 2019 (6 years ago)26 September 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096128
Core clock speed1250 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1468 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate375.8no data
Floating-point processing power12.03 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs256no data
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width2048 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.1.125-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD150−160
+689%
19
−689%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 37
+0%
37
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how Pro Vega 64X and Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega 64X is 689% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.59 4.00
Recency 19 March 2019 26 September 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm

Pro Vega 64X has a 689.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro Vega 64X Radeon Pro Vega 64X
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
vs
GT 750M Mac Edition GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
Pro Vega 64X Radeon Pro Vega 64X
vs
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
vs
RTX 3070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Ice Lake GT3e Ice Lake GT3e
vs
Radeon 620 Radeon 620
Iris Plus Graphics 950 Iris Plus Graphics 950
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Pro Vega 64X Radeon Pro Vega 64X
vs
Graphics 448SP Radeon Graphics 448SP
Apollo Lake GT1 5 Apollo Lake GT1 5
vs
RX 5950 Radeon RX 5950
Apollo Lake GT1 5 Apollo Lake GT1 5
vs
UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
K2100M Quadro K2100M
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
FirePro S7150 FirePro S7150

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 37 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 312 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64X or Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.