GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking186not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.72no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10AD103
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date19 March 2019 (6 years ago)March 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40965888
Core clock speed1250 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz2475 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate375.8455.4
Floating-point processing power12.03 TFLOPS29.15 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 200 Watt

Pro Vega 64X has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4070 AD103, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64X and GeForce RTX 4070 AD103. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103
GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 36 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64X or GeForce RTX 4070 AD103, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.