Quadro RTX A6000 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Place in performance ranking	115	84
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	70.55	0.47
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Vega 10	Ampere
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	19 March 2019 (5 years ago)	5 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$4,649
Current price	$366	$8932 (1.9x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega 64X has 14911% better value for money than RTX A6000.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	10752
Core clock speed	1250 MHz	1410 MHz
Boost clock speed	1468 MHz	1800 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	375.8	625.0

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Quadro RTX A6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	8-pin EPS

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	768.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.2
CUDA	no data	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	140−150 −13.6%	159 +13.6%
1440p	110−120 −17.3%	129 +17.3%
4K	95−100 −11.6%	106 +11.6%

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	37.79	41.97
Recency	19 March 2019	5 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	300 Watt