GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 64X with GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega 64X
2019
16 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
34.78

RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms Pro Vega 64X by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14618
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.5941.42
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10AD103
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date19 March 2019 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40969728
Core clock speed1250 MHz1335 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate375.8515.3
Floating-point processing power12.03 TFLOPS32.98 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs256304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 64X 34.78
RTX 4090 Mobile 72.07
+107%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega 64X 13369
RTX 4090 Mobile 27699
+107%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
−120%
176
+120%
1440p60−65
−122%
133
+122%
4K35−40
−131%
81
+131%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220
+0%
220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 156
+0%
156
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 143
+0%
143
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+0%
71
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 398
+0%
398
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 200
+0%
200
+0%
Metro Exodus 148
+0%
148
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+0%
68
+0%
Dota 2 174
+0%
174
+0%
Far Cry 5 136
+0%
136
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 387
+0%
387
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 138
+0%
138
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 262
+0%
262
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 123
+0%
123
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+0%
63
+0%
Dota 2 187
+0%
187
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 369
+0%
369
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 179
+0%
179
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 139
+0%
139
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
World of Tanks 516
+0%
516
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+0%
47
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 294
+0%
294
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 128
+0%
128
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164
+0%
164
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
Dota 2 172
+0%
172
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+0%
174
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 174
+0%
174
+0%
World of Tanks 314
+0%
314
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Dota 2 179
+0%
179
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 156
+0%
156
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

This is how Pro Vega 64X and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 120% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 122% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 131% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.78 72.07
Recency 19 March 2019 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

RTX 4090 Mobile has a 107.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 64X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 692 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.