ATI Radeon DDR VIVO SE vs Pro Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking202not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.50no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameVega 10Rage 6
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Core clock speed1250 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate345.61.098
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs2566
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB64 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s5.856 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm

Pro Vega 64 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Radeon DDR VIVO SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon DDR VIVO SE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon DDR VIVO SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64 or Radeon DDR VIVO SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.