Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro Vega 16 Pro Vega 20 Pro Vega 48 Pro Vega 56 Pro Vega 64 Pro Vega 64X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 64 with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega 64
2017
16 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
29.15
+269%

Pro Vega 64 outperforms T500 Mobile by a whopping 269% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro Vega 64 Pro Vega 64
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking197531
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.3835.27
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)2 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096896
Core clock speed1250 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate345.694.92
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs25656
L1 Cache1 MB896 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+261%
36
−261%
1440p55−60
+267%
15
−267%
4K60−65
+253%
17
−253%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+0%
31
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Pro Vega 64 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega 64 is 261% faster in 1080p
  • Pro Vega 64 is 267% faster in 1440p
  • Pro Vega 64 is 253% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 51 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 29.15 7.89
Recency 27 June 2017 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 18 Watt

Pro Vega 64 has a 269.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1288.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
vs
RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
K2200M Quadro K2200M
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile NVIDIA PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RX 560 896SP 560 896SP
T500 Max-Q T500 Max-Q
vs
Quadro P620 P620
RTX 4060 NVIDIA RTX 4060
vs
GRID M3-3020 M3-3020
RX 6750 XT 6750 XT
vs
RX 550 640SP 550 640SP
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
vs
GRID M60-1Q M60-1Q
UHD Graphics 920 Intel Graphics 920
vs
Pro WX 4170 Mobile 4170 Mobile
RX 550 640SP AMD RX 550 640SP
vs
R7 M365X M365X
GeForce MX450 GeForce MX450
vs
R7 M365X M365X
Quadro P520 Quadro P520
vs
P102-100 100
ATI 3D Rage II+ DVD ATI Rage II+ DVD
vs
R7 350 350

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 112 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64 or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.