Arc Pro B60 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Arc Pro B60, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro Vega 64
2017
16 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
29.15
+3.5%

Pro 64 outperforms Pro B60 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking201216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data30.54
Power efficiency9.4111.37
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameVega 10BMG-G21
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)5 September 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962560
Core clock speed1250 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate345.6384.0
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs256160
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length267 mm167 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB24 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s456.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro Vega 64 29.15
+3.5%
Arc Pro B60 28.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega 64 12890
+3.5%
Samples: 25
Arc Pro B60 12455
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.15 28.17
Recency 27 June 2017 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 200 Watt

Pro Vega 64 has a 3.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Pro B60, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Arc Pro B60.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
Intel Arc Pro B60
Arc Pro B60

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 13 votes

Rate Arc Pro B60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64 or Arc Pro B60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.