Radeon RX 5900 XT vs Pro VII

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking158not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.80no data
Power efficiency9.22no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega 20Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38404352
Core clock speed1400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1735 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate408.0471.9
Floating-point processing power13.06 TFLOPS15.1 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs240272

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt

Pro VII has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro VII and Radeon RX 5900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro VII is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
AMD Radeon RX 5900 XT
Radeon RX 5900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1548 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 67 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.