RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro VII

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro VII and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro VII
2020
16 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
33.32

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Pro VII by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking16148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.86no data
Power efficiency9.1452.86
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 20AD104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38406144
Core clock speed1400 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate408.0299.5
Floating-point processing power13.06 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs240192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length305 mm168 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB20 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s280.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro VII 33.32
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 53.97
+62%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro VII 12838
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20796
+62%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.32 53.97
Recency 13 May 2020 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 62% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro VII in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1549 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.