GeForce 8400M GT vs A100 SXM4

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.88
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGA100G86
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (5 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores691216
Core clock speed1410 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate609.13.600
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS0.0288 TFLOPS
ROPs1604
TMUs4328
Tensor Cores432no data
L1 Cache20.3 MBno data
L2 Cache40 MB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2EGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount40 GB512 MB
Memory bus width5120 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s19.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA8.01.1
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 9 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 14 Watt

A100 SXM4 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 7900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.

8400M GT, on the other hand, has 2757.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and GeForce 8400M GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8400M GT is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
GeForce 8400M GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A100 SXM4 or GeForce 8400M GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.